Questions in the portfolio activities | Communication Subcategories | Common | Professionalism Subcategories | Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NV* | PP* | SC* | CDS* | DPR* | R* | ER* | EA* | V* | |||
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
Course Evaluation and Learning | |||||||||||
What did you learn in the communication module? | 13 (19) | 8 (11) | 15 (21) | 9 (13) | 9 (13) | 16 (23) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70 (100) | |
What did you learn in the professionalism module? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 (58) | 12 (19) | 9 (14) | 6 (9) | 64 (100) | |
IRAMUTEC analysis | skills, listening, and summarising | reflection, empathy, ethics, respect and attitude | |||||||||
Self-Efficacy Activity | |||||||||||
Why did the clinical activity stimulate the development of communication? | 4 (10) | 10 (25) | 6 (15) | 2 (5) | 3 (7.5) | 5 (12.5) | 0 | 9 (22.5) | 1 (2.5) | 40 (100) | |
Why did the clinical activity stimulate the development of professionalism? | 1 (2) | 7 (15.5) | 0 | 0 | 1 (2) | 8 (18) | 10 (22) | 12 (27) | 6 (13.5) | 45 (100) | |
IRAMUTEC analysis | understanding, orientation, context, and clinic | reflection, thinking, respect and ethics | |||||||||
Free Reflective Writing | 11 (8) | 20 (13.5) | 16 (10) | 0 | 21 (14) | ** | 26 (17.5) | 31 (21) | 24 (16) | 149 (100) | |
IRAMUTEC analysis | to put in’, ‘stay’, and ‘patient’ |
*Non-verbal communication (NV), the patient perspective (PP), the steps of consultation (SC), communication in difficult situations (CDS), doctor-patient relationship (DPR), reflection (R), ethics and responsibility (ER), empathy and altruism (EA) and values (V). The numbers are related to how many times the subcategory occurred in each question. The number of times is given first and the frequency, relative to all fragments of the same question, is given in parentheses.**All fragments involved reflection in FRW.
Int J Med Educ. 2020; 11:37-46; doi: 10.5116/ijme.5e2a.fa68