Table 2. Overview of nursing ethics training
Question/Variable Responses Numbers of respondents
Is there only one nursing ethics training? (n=237) Yes 100 42.1
No 133 56.1
N.A. 4 1.6
Participation conditions (n=237) clinical ladder 161 67.9
personal preference 31 13.0
others 25 10.5
years of experience 13 5.4
N.A. 7 2.9
Training duration (n=237) 60 minutes 82 34.5
90 minutes 50 21.0
120 minutes 36 15.1
half a day 42 17.7
a day 7 2.9
others 19 8.0
N.A. 1 0.4
pre-training assignments (n=237) Yes 154 64.9
No 83 35.0
N.A 0 0.0
The content for "Yes"(n=154)   write about a case in which you felt you had an ethical issue 81 52.6
write about how you feel about ethics on a daily basis 18 11.7
others 49 31.8
N.A 6 3.9
post-training assignments (n=237) Yes 131 55.2
No 104 43.8
N.A 2 0.8
training method (n=237) lectures 20 8.4
lectures and exercises 203 85.6
exercises 11 4.6
others 3 1.2
N.A 0 0.0
training goals (multiple answers) (n=237) to become aware of ethical problems in clinical practice 139 58.6
to learn how to analyze problems that arise in clinical practice from an ethical perspective 103 43.4
to examine one's own actions to resolve ethical problems that arise in clinical practice 70 29.5
to gain knowledge about ethics in clinical practice 67 28.2
to collaborate with a wide variety of professionals to resolve ethical problems in clinical practice 27 11.3
to facilitate, within a team, the resolution of ethical problems that arise in clinical practice 13 5.4
others 5 2.1
whether the learning outcomes were achieved (n=237) agree 38 16.3
somewhat agree 130 55.8
somewhat disagree 55 23.6
disagree 1 0.4
N.A. 13 5.6
The reasons for not achieving the goal (multiple answers)(n=56) training does not translate into clinical practice 35 62.5
lecture/training sessions are given in a passive style 33 58.9
not enough time is allocated 23 41.1
nursing ethics training program in nursing department is not well developed 22 39.3
trainees' motivation is low 21 37.5
inadequate ethics training on the planning side 13 23.2
a lack of qualified personnel 10 17.9
a lack of active discussion and debate among participants during exercises 6 10.7
does not meet the needs of diverse trainees 5 8.9
the case study selection for exercises was inappropriate 1 1.8
others 4 7.1
The learning outcomes(multiple answers)(n=237) able to participate in discussions about ethical problems and express my thoughts 109 45.9
able to participate in discussions about ethical problems and communicate from an ethical perspective 82 34.5
able to explain the ethical problems I have experienced to others 79 33.3
able to analyze cases from an ethical perspective 78 32.9
able to take action to resolve ethical problems that arise in clinical practice 53 22.3
able to speak from an ethical perspective at a ward conference 56 23.6
able to explain ethical principles 47 19.8
able to describe the characteristics of ethical problems in a clinical setting 32 13.5
able to collaborate with multiple professions to resolve ethical problems that arise in clinical practice 27 11.1
able to explain concepts such as ethics 24 10.1
able to demonstrate leadership in addressing ethical problems in the wards 16 6.7
others 8 3.3
Lecturers (n=225) certified nurse specialists 82 36.4
education staff in a nursing department 72 32.0
personnel in a hospital who are familiar with nursing ethics 29 12.8
head nurses of a ward 27 12.0
deputy directors of a nursing department 25 11.1
external ethics experts 13 5.7
internal ethics experts 3 1.3
others 64 28.4
The subjects of the lectures(n=225)(multiple answers) what is nursing ethics? 174 77.3
ethical problems and dilemmas faced in clinical practice 169 75.1
what is ethics? 161 71.5
ethical principles 160 71.1
JNA Code of Ethics for Nurses and other codes of ethics 144 64.0
ethical responsibility and ethical behavior of nurses 133 59.1
approach to considering ethical problems 131 58.2
methodology for examining ethical problems 114 50.6
rights of patients 110 48.8
significance of discussing ethical problems 108 48.0
points to consider when examining ethical problems 101 44.8
autonomy of patients 81 36.0
informed consent 69 30.6
confidentiality 63 28.0
protection of patients' personal information 60 26.6
others 13 5.7
Form of exercise (n=215) small group work 201 93.4
role-playing 4 1.8
others 9 4.1
N.A 1 0.4
he degree to which they devised the exercises (n=215) devising 135 62.7
somewhat devising 57 26.5
not devising much 7 3.7
not devising 1 0.9
N.A. 15 6.0
The methods they used for devising (multiple answers) (n=192) tell trainees that it is important to be able to discuss ethical problems and feelings of discomfort with other trainees in lectures 144 75.0
tell trainees to express their own thoughts and ideas during exercises 140 72.9
consider group composition so that trainees can actively speak up 135 70.3
tell trainees that speaking from an ethical perspective will lead to the welfare of patients in practice 61 31.8
others 29 15.1
materials used in the exercises (n= 215) common simulated cases 99 45.5
cases experienced by trainees 76 35.3
cases in cartoons 5 2.3
video materials 3 1.8
others 12 5.1
N.A. 21 9.7
The selection of case studies(n= 215)(multiple answers)  suggested by the planner 104 48.3
selected based on the cases in the pre-assignment 35 16.2
selected from trainees' experiences 35 16.2
selected themes under discussion in the hospital 10 4.6
selected from themes requested by trainees 9 4.1
selected themes popular in society 2 0.9
others 18 8.3
N.A 2 0.4
The details of the cases(n=215)(multiple answers)  physical restraint 128 59.5
treatment choice and decision making for patients with capacity 120 55.8
surrogate decision-making for patients with diminished decision-making capacity 121 56.2
matters related to the intentions of patients and families and their differences 134 62.3
matters related to respect for patients’ rights 95 44.1
matters related to end-of-life care 87 40.4
matters related to conflicts of values with physicians and other professions 81 37.6
matters related to the personality and dignity of patients 76 35.3
informed consent 50 23.2
matters related to confidentiality and personal information 31 14.4
others 12 5.5
Facilitators to support exercises (n=215) Yes 158 73.4
No 56 26.0
N.A. 1 0.4
Continuing training for facilitators (n=158) Yes 28 17.7
No 130 82.2
N.A. 0 0.0
Self-improvement as a planner (n=237) Have outside learning opportunities to improve knowledge and skills related to nursing ethics 114 48.1
Gather new information about nursing ethics through books and the internet 87 36.7
Participate in internal training to improve knowledge and skills regarding nursing ethics 12 5.0
nothing 9 3.7
others 7 2.9
N.A 8 3.3
The planner’s emphasis(multiple answers)(n=237) create lectures that do not make trainees feel that ethics is a difficult topic to learn 103 43.4
include realistic examples that trainees are likely to encounter 111 46.8
enable trainees to experience concrete analysis of ethical issues during training 87 36.7
create an environment where trainees can actively participate in discussions and speak up 78 32.9
conduct interviews concerning ethical problems that arise in the hospital and apply them to planning 30 12.6
include more practical content than ethics and concepts 26 10.9
improve areas that trainees rated poorly last year 10 4.2
others 5 2.1
Challenges by planners (multiple answers)(n=237) training does not translate into practice 96 40.5
there is a lack of personnel to provide training 76 32.0
there is no continuing training program 62 26.1
lectures / training sessions are delivered in a passive style 61 25.7
not enough time is allocated 59 24.8
ethics training on the planning side is inadequate 51 21.5
there level of ethics awareness within the organization is not high 48 20.2
participation from other professions is lacking 40 16.8
trainees' motivation is low 38 16.0
trainees cannot express or discuss ethical problems during exercises 10 4.2
does not meet the needs of diverse trainees 8 3.3
the selection of case studies for exercises was inappropriate 4 1.6
the training method was inappropriate 2 0.8
others 20 8.4
Int J Med Educ. 2024; 15:84-98; doi: 10.5116/ijme.669f.70b3