Table 3. Concerns about planning nursing ethics training
Item to consider   Concerns
planning side competence planners’ lack of competence in ethics
differences in trainees’ ethics competence
lack of ethics experts in the organization
system unable to secure staff to focus on training
one-person system with no one to consult
burdened by the time required for preparation
high turnover of training staff on an annual basis
no ongoing training to improve skills
unable to secure facilitators
planning lecture topics how to teach things that don't have answers?
topics are difficult
stuck in a rut
sharing opinions and progress creating an atmosphere that acknowledges different values
providing an opportunity to become aware of everyday ethics
presentations and sharing of opinions tend to be redundant
discussions do not progress well
facilitation is inadequate
trainees and level settings multi professions are not participating
whether the training is appropriate for each clinical ladder
not being able to meet the needs of each trainee
goal where to set the theme
there is a mismatch between goals and learning content
the level of difficulty is set too low
learning outcomes where to focus
cannot achieve learning outcomes
selection of case studies whether they are appropriate as examples
similar examples are used
privacy should be taken into consideration
whether on-site problems can be presented
selection of instructors and ensuring that they are well qualified whether the qualifications of instructors are appropriate
ensuring that instructors are well versed in ethics
selection of case study analysis methods whether effective methods are selected
difficulty in deepening understanding of analysis methods
training hours too short and the content is not conveyed
lack of time for exercises
trainee's side differences in trainee readiness belong to different departments
become less motivated each year
few participants
perceive that ethics is difficult
large knowledge gaps difficulty capturing knowledge in advance
inconsistent levels of knowledge
value differences in the planning side how to appeal to the sensibilities of Generation Z?
not feeling a dilemma
passive attitude not speaking up or expressing an opinion
just listening to the lecture
a tendency to find answers too quickly sticking to the right answer
trying to find answers too quickly
translation into practice the training is not translated into clinical practice content of the training is not clinically applicable
concepts and clinical practice cannot be integrated
there is no system to apply the learning in training to clinical practice ethics conferences in wards are not taking root
not used to discussing ethics
the use of training in practice cannot be evaluated unable to identify clinical uses in detail
no method to assess specific uses
Int J Med Educ. 2024; 15:84-98; doi: 10.5116/ijme.669f.70b3