Table 2. Comparison of endorsement of professional values and satisfaction with major between the two samples
Variable Korean M (SE) Chinese M (SE) t df p p_FDR Cohen's d [95% CI]
Competence .79 (.03) .62 (.05) 3.27 319 = .001 = .005 0.38 [0.15, 0.62]
Diversity .34 (.03) .38 (.05) −0.72 319 = .472 = .614 −0.08 [−0.32, 0.15]
Remuneration .29 (.03) .37 (.05) −1.44 319 = .152 = .282 −0.17 [−0.40, 0.06]
Stability .38 (.03) .40 (.05) −0.36 319 = .717 = .847 −0.04 [−0.27, 0.19]
Social recognition .31 (.03) .48 (.05) −3.01 319 = .003 = .009 −0.35 [−0.59, −0.12]
Leadership .15 (.02) .11 (.03) 0.94 319 = .347 = .501 0.11 [−0.12, 0.34]
Collaboration .42 (.03) .20 (.04) 4.05 319 < .001 < .001 0.48 [0.24, 0.71]
Social contribution .56 (.03) .55 (.05) 0.24 319 = .814 = .882 0.03 [−0.20, 0.26]
Career development .44 (.03) .44 (.05) −0.01 319 = .995 = .995 0.00 [−0.23, 0.23]
Creativity .26 (.03) .18 (.04) 1.59 319 = .114 = .247 0.19 [−0.04, 0.42]
Autonomy .21 (.03) .16 (.04) 0.97 319 = .335 = .501 0.11 [−0.12, 0.34]
Self-actualization .60 (.03) .50 (.05) 1.75 319 = .081 = .210 0.21 [−0.03, 0.44]
Satisfaction with major 4.36 (.05) 1.89 (.07) 27.66 318 < .001 < .001 3.26 [2.91, 3.60]

Note. For the 12 inventory items, the values are endorsement proportions (1 = endorsed, 0 = not endorsed), and the standardized mean difference is interpreted as the standardized difference between two proportions. Satisfaction with the major was rated on a five-point scale. Positive t values indicate higher values in the Korean sample. The degrees of freedom for satisfaction with the major are 318 due to one missing response. p_FDR = p value after Benjamini–Hochberg correction across the 13 comparisons. CI = confidence interval.

Int J Med Educ. 2026; 17:146-155; doi: 10.5116/ijme.6ac6.3280