TY - JOUR T1 - Can empathy be preserved in medical education? AU - Seeberger, A. AU - Lönn, A. AU - Hult, H. AU - Weurlander, M. AU - Wernerson, A. KW - empathy KW - professionalisation KW - medical education KW - students´ experiences KW - reflection KW - PY - 2020/04/20 Y1 - 2020/03/31 VL - 11 N1 - doi: 10.5116/ijme.5e83.31cf DO - 10.5116/ijme.5e83.31cf M3 - doi: 10.5116/ijme.5e83.31cf JO - Int J Med Educ SP - 83 EP - 89 PB - IJME SN - 2042-6372 UR - http://www.ijme.net/archive/11/empathy-preservation-in-medical-education/ L1 - http://www.ijme.net/archive/11/empathy-preservation-in-medical-education.pdf N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate changes in empathy during medical education, as well as to identify promoters and inhibitors of empathy and analyse their roles. Methods: We used qualitative content analysis to examine 69 critically reflective essays written by medical students as a part of their final examination at the end of the medical program. The essays were based on previous self-evaluations performed each term and represented retrospective reflections on their professional development. Results: A majority of the students felt that their empathy did not decrease during medical education. On the contrary, many felt that their empathy had increased, especially the cognitive part of empathy, without loss of affective empathy. Many of them described a professionalisation process resulting in an ability to meet patients with preserved empathy but without being overwhelmed by emotions. They identified several factors that promoted the development of empathy: a multiplicity of patients, positive role models, and educational activities focusing on reflection and self-awareness. They also identified inhibitors of empathy: lack of professional competence and a stressful and empathy-hostile medical culture. Conclusions: Our analysis of these retrospective reflections by students suggests that empathy can be preserved during medical education, despite the presence of important inhibitors of empathy. This finding might be due to the presence of more potent promoters and/or to the fact that educational activities might result in a decreased susceptibility to empathy-decreasing circumstances. ER -