ORIGINAL RESEARCH 2070 DOWNLOADS

The relationship between script concordance test scores in an obstetrics-gynecology rotation and global performance assessments in the curriculum

Patricia Monnier1, Marie-Josée Bédard2, Robert Gagnon3 and Bernard Charlin3

1MUHC Reproductive Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Canada

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Canada

3Unit for Research and Development in Health Sciences Education, Université de Montréal, Canada

Submitted: 21/10/2010; Accepted: 03/01/2011; Published: 07/01/2011

Int J Med Educ. 2011; 2:3-6; doi: 10.5116/ijme.4d21.bf89

© 2011 Patricia Monnier et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use of work provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

Objectives: To determine the relationship between script concordance test scores obtained at the end of clerkship rotation in ob-gyn and global performance measures for the entire curriculum as expressed by a preclinical and clerkship score in the Dean's Letter. The relationship also considered two other existing instruments.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on a convenience sample of 129 clerkship students. Three instruments (Script Concordance Test, Key-Features Examinations and In-Training Report) were used to assess clinical reasoning. Data were collected from four Montreal University Hospitals at the end of four consecutive obstetrics and gynecology rotations. The data pertaining to the Dean's Letter were collected at the end of the clerkship training period.

Results: Cronbach's alpha values were 0.67 for the script concordance test and 0.36 for Key Features Examinations. A significantly positive correlation was found between the preclinical (r = 0.260, p = 0.01) and clerkship (r = 0.232, p = 0.01) scores of the Dean's Letter and the script concordance test. Regression analysis showed that the best predictor for the clerkship score of the Dean's Letter was the script concordance test (r = 0.226, p = 0.014).

Conclusions: The script concordance test was associated with the scores in the Dean's Letter in comparison with two other scales, which suggests that the test can be a useful tool for clinical educators who are engaged in the assessment of clinical reasoning, particularly in clerkship students. However, further work is required to establish this association.